Valence Security has carved out a niche in the SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) space by focusing on SaaS-to-SaaS integrations and third-party app connections. But as organizations evaluate their options, many are discovering that Valence's strengths come with significant trade-offs, particularly around data protection, pricing transparency, and coverage breadth.

Whether you're evaluating Valence for the first time or looking to replace it with a more comprehensive solution, this guide breaks down the top alternatives and what each actually delivers.

Why Organizations Are Exploring Valence Security Alternatives

Before diving into competitors, it's important to understand where Valence falls short for many teams:

Data security isn't the focus. Industry analysts consistently note that while Valence excels at configuration and identity visibility, data access governance and DLP aren't primary capabilities. Organizations whose top priority is preventing sensitive data exposure often find Valence lacking the granular, content-aware controls they need.

Enterprise pricing creates barriers. According to Vendr transaction data, Valence's average annual cost is approximately $78,000, with contracts ranging up to $101,000. This enterprise-only pricing model, with no published tiers, makes it inaccessible for mid-market organizations and difficult to budget for anyone.

Limited coverage for niche applications. Gartner Peer Insights reviewers note that Valence "works with major vendors like Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Slack" but has "limited coverage for niche or custom SaaS applications." Organizations with diverse SaaS stacks find themselves with persistent blind spots.

Small market presence. With only 3.4% mindshare in the SSPM category according to PeerSpot, Valence remains a smaller player in a competitive market. This raises questions about long-term viability and innovation pace compared to larger, better-funded competitors.

Integration-focused, not security-complete. Valence's strength in SaaS-to-SaaS integration monitoring doesn't translate to comprehensive security posture management. Teams still need additional tools to address the full spectrum of SaaS risks.

What Matters When Choosing a Valence Alternative

When evaluating SSPM platforms, prioritize:

1. Complete coverage - Shadow SaaS, shadow AI, identities, configurations, and data access
2. Automated remediation - Fixes problems, not just surfaces them
3. Transparent pricing - Know costs before committing to sales conversations
4. Fast time-to-value - Minutes to visibility, not weeks of implementation
5. Operational efficiency - Maintain security without dedicated staff

Top Valence Security Alternatives for 2025

1. Perimeters

Best for: Complete SaaS security with transparent pricing and immediate results

Perimeters delivers what security teams actually need: comprehensive SaaS visibility, automated remediation, and transparent pricing, all without the enterprise sales cycle that Valence requires.

While Valence focuses narrowly on SaaS-to-SaaS integrations and charges $78,000+ annually for the privilege, Perimeters provides full-spectrum SSPM capabilities at $3 per user per month. The difference isn't just price. It's philosophy. Perimeters believes security tools should be accessible, fast to deploy, and automated by default.

Key advantages over Valence:

• Instant, comprehensive discovery - Full visibility into your SaaS environment within minutes, including shadow apps, shadow AI, identities, and misconfigurations that Valence's narrower scope misses
• True automated remediation - Resolve hundreds of issues with bulk actions and automated workflows, not just the "flexible remediation options" Valence advertises that still require significant manual effort
• Context-based severity ranking - Hundreds of security parameters continuously checked with findings prioritized by actual business impact
• Complete identity governance - Detect partial offboarding, over-privileged accounts, inactive users, and risky access patterns across your entire SaaS estate
• Shadow AI discovery - Comprehensive GenAI app governance that goes beyond Valence's emerging capabilities

The cost comparison speaks for itself:

FactorPerimetersValence SecurityAnnual cost (500 users)$18,000$78,000+ averagePricing transparencyPublishedQuote-onlyTime to valueMinutesWeeksFree trialYesNoData security focusCore capabilityLimited

What customers say:

"Perimeters gives us a central point of control, providing clear findings and remediation tools to save time and reduce confusion."

"With Perimeters I can spend a few minutes at a time taking care of well-defined issues with all the information in one place."

Pricing: $3 per active user per month. Straightforward, predictable, and roughly 75% less than Valence.

Best suited for: Organizations of any size seeking comprehensive SSPM without enterprise pricing, lengthy implementations, or gaps in data security coverage.

Start your free trial →

2. DoControl

Best for: Organizations with specific DLP requirements for collaboration tools

DoControl emphasizes data loss prevention and access governance, particularly for collaboration applications like Google Workspace, Slack, and Microsoft 365.

What it offers:

• Data access governance with content classification
• Automated access control workflows
• Insider threat detection capabilities
• Third-party OAuth monitoring

Where it falls short:

• Collaboration-centric scope - Strong for file sharing and messaging platforms, but limited visibility into broader SaaS categories like HR, finance, or DevOps tools
• Enterprise pricing opacity - Like Valence, requires sales engagement with no published pricing, creating budget uncertainty
• Complex workflow configuration - Automation capabilities require significant setup effort and ongoing tuning
• Alert volume challenges - Extensive monitoring can generate alert fatigue for teams without dedicated security staff
• Not a complete SSPM - Primarily a DLP tool that has expanded into adjacent areas; configuration management remains secondary

DoControl addresses a specific use case well but requires supplementation for comprehensive SaaS security.

3. AppOmni

Best for: Salesforce-dominated enterprises with deep pockets

AppOmni built its reputation on deep Salesforce integration and has expanded to cover other major enterprise applications like ServiceNow and Microsoft 365.

What it offers:

• Deep configuration monitoring for supported platforms
• Compliance alignment with industry frameworks
• Data exposure analysis for core applications
• Integration with security orchestration tools

Where it falls short:

• Narrow application focus - Exceptional for Salesforce, adequate for a handful of others, minimal for the long tail of SaaS applications most organizations use
• AWS Marketplace pricing reveals costs - $7,500 per year for just 100 users on a single SaaS app; enterprise-wide coverage becomes extremely expensive
• Visibility without action - Strong at identifying problems but remediation capabilities lag purpose-built solutions
• Implementation complexity - Professional services often required for full deployment, extending time-to-value
• Enterprise-only positioning - Mid-market organizations find themselves priced out or underserved

Organizations centered entirely on Salesforce may find value; everyone else should look elsewhere.

4. Obsidian Security

Best for: Security operations teams with investigation resources

Obsidian differentiates by combining SSPM with User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA), positioning itself as a threat detection and investigation platform for SaaS environments.

What it offers:

• User behavior analytics across SaaS platforms
• Account compromise and insider threat detection
• Investigation and forensics capabilities
• Integration with security operations workflows

Where it falls short:

• Detection over prevention - Excels at finding threats after they occur; less effective at hardening posture proactively
• Requires security expertise - Designed for mature security operations centers with dedicated investigation staff
• Limited automation - Investigation-focused approach means manual effort remains high
• Complex pricing structure - Enterprise contracts with variable costs based on data volume create unpredictable expenses
• Narrow use case - Organizations focused on compliance, configuration hygiene, or lean security teams find limited value

Obsidian works as a SOC tool for large enterprises, not as a primary SSPM for most organizations.

5. Wing Security

Best for: Organizations wanting to dip a toe into SSPM

Wing Security offers a freemium model providing basic SaaS inventory at no cost, with paid tiers adding security controls.

What it offers:

• Free SaaS discovery and inventory tier
• Third-party app risk assessment
• Compliance monitoring capabilities
• Automated remediation in paid tiers

Where it falls short:

• Free tier is marketing, not security - Basic discovery is useful for evaluation but provides no actual protection
• Platform maturity gaps - As a younger vendor, features that competitors have refined remain rough around the edges
• Configuration flexibility limitations - Users report difficulties customizing to specific organizational needs
• Integration depth issues - Third-party app support lags established competitors
• Scaling concerns - Organizations that start with Wing often outgrow it quickly as requirements mature

Wing provides an entry point but rarely serves as a long-term solution.

6. CrowdStrike Falcon Shield (formerly Adaptive Shield)

Best for: Existing CrowdStrike customers seeking platform consolidation

CrowdStrike acquired Adaptive Shield in late 2024, rebranding it as Falcon Shield and integrating it into the broader Falcon platform.

What it offers:

• 150+ SaaS application integrations
• Misconfiguration detection and compliance mapping
• Identity posture management
• GenAI application security controls

Where it falls short:

• Platform lock-in pressure - Maximum value requires broader CrowdStrike investment; standalone SSPM buyers face upsell pressure
• Post-acquisition uncertainty - Integration into Falcon means the roadmap now serves CrowdStrike's strategy, not pure SSPM innovation
• Manual remediation predominates - Despite acquisition marketing, fixing issues still requires significant manual effort
• Enterprise pricing only - No published tiers; custom quotes create negotiation asymmetry
• Six-hour support response - Compared to competitors offering two-hour or faster response times

Organizations already invested in CrowdStrike may find value in consolidation; others should evaluate purpose-built alternatives.

7. Netskope SSPM

Best for: Organizations committed to Netskope's security platform

Netskope includes SSPM as part of its Security Service Edge (SSE) offering, providing SaaS configuration monitoring alongside CASB and zero-trust capabilities.

What it offers:

• SaaS configuration monitoring and compliance
• Integration with Netskope CASB and DLP
• Automated policy violation alerting
• Unified platform approach

Where it falls short:

• Platform dependency mandatory - SSPM capabilities are diminished without broader Netskope infrastructure
• Feature, not focus - SSPM is one of many capabilities, not a core competency; development attention reflects this
• Reporting limitations - Users consistently note data insights and management reporting need improvement
• Bundled pricing complexity - Difficult to understand what SSPM actually costs versus the broader platform
• Depth sacrificed for breadth - Jack-of-all-trades positioning means SSPM capabilities trail specialized vendors

Netskope SSPM makes sense only for organizations already committed to Netskope's ecosystem.

8. Varonis

Best for: Organizations with significant on-premises data security needs

Varonis built its business on on-premises data security and has extended into cloud and SaaS environments, including Microsoft 365 and Salesforce.

What it offers:

• Data classification and protection
• User behavior analytics
• Permission analysis and cleanup
• Compliance reporting and audit support

Where it falls short:

• On-premises heritage shows - SaaS capabilities feel bolted onto a legacy architecture rather than cloud-native
• Implementation burden - Deployment measured in months with significant professional services requirements
• Cost structure favors large enterprises - Initial investment and ongoing operational costs exceed cloud-native alternatives
• Complexity overhead - Requires dedicated resources to operate effectively; lean teams struggle
• Limited SaaS breadth - Focuses primarily on Microsoft 365 and Salesforce; broader SaaS coverage is limited

Organizations with hybrid on-premises/cloud environments may find value; SaaS-first organizations should look elsewhere.

9. Spin.AI (SpinOne)

Best for: Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 backup with basic security

SpinOne combines SaaS backup with security capabilities, targeting organizations that need both data protection and basic SSPM.

What it offers:

• SaaS backup for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365
• Ransomware detection and recovery
• Basic SSPM and OAuth app governance
• Compliance monitoring

Where it falls short:

• Two platforms only - Coverage limited to Google Workspace and Microsoft 365; everything else remains unprotected
• Backup-first, security-second - SSPM capabilities lack the depth of dedicated posture management tools
• SMB-oriented feature set - Enterprise organizations find capabilities insufficient for complex requirements
• Agent dependencies - Some features require browser extensions that create management overhead
• Configuration limitations - Less flexibility in policy customization compared to purpose-built SSPM

SpinOne works for small organizations wanting backup and basic security in one tool, but it's not a serious Valence alternative.

10. Grip Security

Best for: Shadow SaaS discovery as a starting point

Grip emphasizes SaaS discovery and identity-centric security, helping organizations understand the scope of their SaaS sprawl.

What it offers:

• Shadow SaaS discovery and inventory
• Identity and access visibility
• Risk assessment across discovered applications
• Guided remediation workflows

Where it falls short:

• Discovery-heavy, action-light - Strong at finding applications but remediation capabilities trail competitors
• Extreme enterprise pricing - AWS Marketplace lists $300,000/year, making it inaccessible for most organizations
• Limited depth per application - Breadth of discovery comes at the cost of deep configuration analysis
• Newer market entrant - Less proven track record than established competitors
• Standalone value questions - Often deployed alongside other security tools, raising total cost of ownership

Grip helps organizations understand their SaaS footprint but provides limited value beyond initial discovery.

Valence Security Alternatives Side-by-Side

Making the Right Choice

The SSPM market has fragmented into specialized niches, each vendor optimizing for different use cases. When evaluating Valence alternatives:

For comprehensive, accessible SSPM: Perimeters delivers complete visibility, automated remediation, and transparent pricing at a fraction of Valence's cost. Organizations that want to secure their entire SaaS estate, not just integrations, without enterprise complexity should start here.

For specific use cases: DoControl suits collaboration-focused DLP, Obsidian suits investigation-heavy SOC teams, and platform-bundled options (Netskope, Falcon Shield) suit organizations already committed to those ecosystems.

For enterprises with unlimited budgets: AppOmni or Varonis may provide depth in narrow areas, but expect six-figure annual costs and lengthy implementations.

The reality is that most organizations don't need Valence's $78,000 average contract to secure their SaaS environment. They need a tool that delivers comprehensive visibility, fixes problems automatically, and doesn't require a procurement committee to approve.

Take Control of Your SaaS Security Today

Ready to see what comprehensive SSPM looks like without enterprise pricing?

Start your free trial at Perimeters and get complete visibility in minutes, not weeks.

• ✓ Full SaaS discovery including shadow apps and shadow AI
• ✓ Automated remediation workflows
• ✓ Transparent pricing: $3/user/month